Last week I was talking to an industrial battery charger manufacturer who wishes to remain nameless, and we started talking about ways to replace revenue that was lost in the recession. This person told me about a scenario that exists in the battery and charger market that I was unaware of, and he had some pretty strong feelings about what it means for his business and the industry.
“A couple of years ago, we were approached by a lift truck manufacturer to private-label a charger for them that they could put their name on and sell it through their parts catalog. We talked to our distributors, who said ‘We’d rather fight them out on the street than just have you sell direct.’ Therefore, we declined, but the manufacturer found a French partner, who produced an SCR charger for them with their name on it that they sell as a package with their lift trucks. This was the first time that we had seen one of the major lift truck manufacturers get into the battery charger business.
“At the time, this manufacturer said they were doing it because they need to replace revenue that was lost when new truck sales dropped during the economic downturn. That’s probably true, but I don’t see them stopping now that they’ve developed it and have been moderately successful.”
For distributors, this situation has created a bit of a dilemma. The biggest thing is, it creates a competitive environment, not just between the charger manufacturers like us and the lift truck manufacturers, but also amongst distributors. For a long time, independent battery and charger dealers had the local lift truck dealer as one of their largest customers. Now, if more lift truck dealers are forced to sell what I’m going to call “proprietary” batteries and chargers, that creates some major competitive issues.
At first, it was optional—the distributor could still sell whatever charger they wanted. Then it became mandatory to sell the proprietary charger. Some distributors found ways around it, but in many cases, the charger distributors felt like they were competing with the lift truck dealer. Conversely, the truck dealers were reluctant because they knew they had customers who didn’t want this new charger. They also have long-term relationships with the charger company’s salespeople and distributors. They work very closely, and a lot of them didn’t really want to see that relationship damaged.
If nothing else, it’s caused some changes and uncertainty in the distribution channel. Rumor is that at least one lift truck company has already made a similar request to the battery manufacturers, meaning “proprietary batteries” could be next.
If this does prove to be a viable revenue source for the lift truck manufacturers, it’s only going to become more common. What will this mean for distributors?
I’ve heard for a long time about the impact that proprietary forklift software has on the industry, but this was the first I’d heard of proprietary forklift chargers. I’d like to hear from you. How prevalent is this? What does the future hold?